5 Features and Drawbacks of Google+

The new service is only available to a limited number of people right now, but once it opens up to the public Google+ could prove to be a popular Facebook alternative. Here's a look at some of the features and drawbacks I found while putting Google+ through its paces.

Feature: Circles

Sharing content with friends in Google+ starts with Circles, which are basically groups of friends organized by you. The idea behind Circles is that you may only want to share certain pieces of content such as a NSFW video or a link to a hot button political news story with certain people. As Google sees it, the way we currently share on social networks such as Facebook, Twitter and even Buzz is sloppy (share with everyone all the time), scary (do you really want your coworkers to see everything you do online?) and insensitive (very little nuance in the way you define a friend or family member).





That's where Circles comes in. You assign people to your Circles by simply dragging and dropping their contact card into the group you want them to be a part of and that's it. Circles is a quick and easy way to organize your friends, and it's what Facebook's friends lists should have been.








Google+ is integrated into the navigation bar at the top of almost all Google products (not including Blogger and YouTube). That way you can always keep tabs on the latest notifications from Google+. Even better, you don't have to travel back to the Google+ home page to see what's going on. Just click on the notification icon and the updated conversation appears in a drop-down window on the page you're viewing. You can then add your own comment, mute the post, move through other conversations on Google+ or go back to the home page. The navigation bar also includes a "Share" button so you can share new content without shuffling between pages.





Feature: Easy data liberation



Google likes to talk about how you can get your data out of Google products whenever you want. The company even created a group called the Data Liberation Front that is supposed to make sure Google lives up to its promises. But in my experience, the way to get your data out of apps such as Docs or Gmail is cumbersome and slow. Not so with Google+. Clicking on the cog in the upper right hand corner and selecting "Google+ settings" from the social network's home page brings you to a revamped Google Accounts page. From there, you can select the Data Liberation tab. And with just a few clicks you can download data from your Picasa Web Albums, Google profile, Google+ stream, Buzz and contacts. The process is reminiscent of Facebook's new data download feature.




Google recently launched Google+, the company's latest attempt to get social networking right after its social disaster, Google Buzz. After trying out Google's new social network for several hours, I think Google may have finally figured out how to do social.


Google+ is focused on letting you share photos, links, and videos with your online friends, family and acquaintances. The new service is also designed to let you target your sharing with specific people instead of the default "share with everyone" approach that services like Facebook and Twitter offer. Google+ also offers video chat and instant messaging features that let you chat with individuals or groups of up to 10 people at once.

The new service is only available to a limited number of people right now, but once it opens up to the public Google+ could prove to be a popular Facebook alternative. Here's a look at some of the features and drawbacks I found while putting Google+ through its paces.


Feature: Circles

Sharing content with friends in Google+ starts with Circles, which are basically groups of friends organized by you. The idea behind Circles is that you may only want to share certain pieces of content such as a NSFW video or a link to a hot button political news story with certain people. As Google sees it, the way we currently share on social networks such as Facebook, Twitter and even Buzz is sloppy (share with everyone all the time), scary (do you really want your coworkers to see everything you do online?) and insensitive (very little nuance in the way you define a friend or family member).


That's where Circles comes in. You assign people to your Circles by simply dragging and dropping their contact card into the group you want them to be a part of and that's it. Circles is a quick and easy way to organize your friends, and it's what Facebook's friends lists should have been.


Google+ is integrated into the navigation bar at the top of almost all Google products (not including Blogger and YouTube). That way you can always keep tabs on the latest notifications from Google+. Even better, you don't have to travel back to the Google+ home page to see what's going on. Just click on the notification icon and the updated conversation appears in a drop-down window on the page you're viewing. You can then add your own comment, mute the post, move through other conversations on Google+ or go back to the home page. The navigation bar also includes a "Share" button so you can share new content without shuffling between pages.

Feature: Easy data liberation

Google likes to talk about how you can get your data out of Google products whenever you want. The company even created a group called the Data Liberation Front that is supposed to make sure Google lives up to its promises. But in my experience, the way to get your data out of apps such as Docs or Gmail is cumbersome and slow. Not so with Google+. Clicking on the cog in the upper right hand corner and selecting "Google+ settings" from the social network's home page brings you to a revamped Google Accounts page. From there, you can select the Data Liberation tab. And with just a few clicks you can download data from your Picasa Web Albums, Google profile, Google+ stream, Buzz and contacts. The process is reminiscent of Facebook's new data download feature.

Read more »

Google+ released New Social Networking Site

A day after Google unveiled its brand new social networking service Google+, the company decided to open up the invitation process late Wednesday afternoon to those lucky enough to have already been invited to participate in the service. Thus I got an early look at Google's new social network.

Google has stressed that Google+ is in its early stages. However, whatever Google was aiming for with its "field trial" must have been successful, because as everyone who was invited in to the service is now able to invite other people in.

Even the second wave of invitees was able to invite friends to join the service.

All this attention must have been a bit more than Google bargained for. After about six hours, the company shut the invitation process down over what Google's senior vice president of engineering, Vic Gundotra, called "insane demand."

"We need to do this carefully, and in a controlled way," he posted to his Google+ page late Wednesday night. He did not specify when the invite functionality would return.

Read more »

Mobile Radiation Effects Human Brian

Radiation from cell phones could possibly cause cancer, according to the World Health Organization.

In a report issued today, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), which is an arm of the WHO, said it now lists mobile phone use in the same category as lead, gasoline engine exhaust, and chloroform. Officially, cell phone radiation is listed as a "carcinogenic hazard."

Until today, the WHO's IARC had said that there were no adverse health effects from the use of cell phones. The wireless industry, including the CTIA lobbying group, and the Federal Communications Commission and U.S. Food and Drug Administration have also long maintained that cell phones are safe.

The CTIA, the wireless industry trade association in the U.S., was quick to point out that the WHO's IARC did not say that cell phones definitely cause cancer.

"IARC conducts numerous reviews and in the past has given the same score to, for example, pickled vegetables and coffee," John Walls, vice president of public affairs for CTIA, said in a statement. "This IARC classification does not mean cell phones cause cancer. Under IARC rules, limited evidence from statistical studies can be found even though bias and other data flaws may be the basis for the results."

The group also emphasized that the IARC's determination was based on reviewed published studies and was not the result of new scientific research.

"The IARC working group did not conduct any new research, but rather reviewed published studies," Walls continued. "Based on previous assessments of the scientific evidence, the Federal Communications Commission has concluded that '[t]here's no scientific evidence that proves that wireless phone usage can lead to cancer.' The Food and Drug Administration has also stated that '[t]he weight of scientific evidence has not linked cell phones with any health problems.'"

In response to Tuesday's news, an FCC spokesman said, "The FCC currently requires cell phones to meet safety standards based on the advice of federal health and safety agencies. We support the IARC recommendation for more research to clearly identify any potential health risks and, as appropriate, consider whether further actions may be required."

The new determination from the WHO's IARC was established at a meeting in France where a team of 31 scientists from 14 countries, including the United States, considered peer-reviewed studies about the safety of cell phones. The team said that it had found enough evidence to consider exposure to cell phone radiation as "possibly carcinogenic to humans."

The scientists reiterated what many in the field have said for years, which is that there are not enough long-term studies to decisively say one way or another whether cell phone radiation causes cancer. But there is enough data to show connections between exposure and health risks for consumers to be concerned.


Jonathan Samet, a medical doctor and professor from the University of Southern California, and the overall Chairman of the IARC's Working Group, which reviewed the studies, said in a statement today that "the evidence, while still accumulating, is strong enough to support a conclusion and the 2B classification. The conclusion means that there could be some risk, and therefore we need to keep a close watch for a link between cell phones and cancer risk."

The IARC has not yet published new guidelines for cell phone use, but the director of the organization suggested that concerned consumers take precautions to reduce exposure. He also emphasized the need for more research.

"Given the potential consequences for public health of this classification and findings, it is important that additional research be conducted into the long-term, heavy use of mobile phones," IARC Director Christopher Wild said in a statement. "Pending the availability of such information, it is important to take pragmatic measures to reduce exposure such as hands?free devices or texting."

The IARC said in a statement that it considered hundreds of scientific articles, including some recent articles that had been published as a result of the 10-year Interphone study.



A report summarizing the main conclusions of the IARC Working Group and the evaluations of the carcinogenic hazard from radiofrequency electromagnetic fields, including the use of cell phones, will be published in the medical journal, The Lancet Oncology in its July 1 issue. The IARC also expects to publish the full report online in a few days.

A year ago, the IARC published some results from the Interphone research project, an ambitious, decade-long study that included data gathered by 21 scientists from around the world to study 13,000 individuals in 13 different countries. It was the largest research program to study the effects of cell phone radiation to date, but many researchers conceded that the results of the study were inconclusive.

Initially, the official word from the WHO's IARC was that most cell phone use did not lead to an increased risk of either meningioma, a common but typically benign form of cancer, or glioma, a rare but more dangerous type of brain cancer. But the group conceded that more research is needed, especially since cell phone use has increased dramatically since 2000, particularly among younger people.

"An increased risk of brain cancer is not established from the data from Interphone," Wile, IARC's director, said in a statement at the time that the report was issued. "However, observations at the highest level of cumulative call time and the changing patterns of mobile phone use since the period studied by Interphone, particularly in young people, mean that further investigation of mobile phone use and brain cancer risk is merited."

Some experts have interpreted the results to suggest that people who use a cell phone for at least an hour each day over a 10-year period are at an increased risk of developing some brain tumors. This research, these experts argue, also suggests that these tumors are more likely to be on the side of the head where the phone is most often used.

However, the authors of the epidemiological studies that came to these conclusions have acknowledged that possible biases and errors from those participating in the survey meant that these results were not conclusive enough to directly blame cell phone radiation for such tumors. For example, critics of these studies say that subjects may have recall bias. Subjects in the study diagnosed with brain tumors may have better recall of how often they used their cell phones and on which side of their heads they usually placed their phones than the control groups that do not suffer from these ailments.

Today's determination by the WHO's IARC that cell phone use could cause cancer still does little to clear up the confusion around whether cell phones present a significant risk to human health. We simply still do not know. But to date, the World Health Organization's warning is the most significant one so far to suggest that people take precautions.

Read more »

Stunning HTC Desire

All things must come to an end (or at least be supplanted by something new). The HTC Desire S has arrived to take over from its predecessor in the Android race.

In many ways, it's quite similar. We'll still be looking at a 3.7-inch 480 x 800 screen, Android overlaid with HTC's Sense UI and a 1GHz processor. However, HTC hasn't totally rested on its laurels.

The RAM is increased for the upgraded Android 2.3, there's now 1GB of built-in memory and it's made with a premium aluminium unibody shell.


The Desire S also brings improvements in video recording, with 720p HD capture now supported, though the sensor stays at five megapixels.

The wireless technology has also had a welcome boost, with 14.4Mbps HSDPA 3G broadband and Wi-Fi 802.11n support both added.

The battery is also slightly larger (up to 1450mAh, which is still smaller than a lot of the competition), though HTC is claiming as much as a 20 per cent increase in standby and talk time.

The HTC Desire S is classy. The original Desire was incredibly well built, but HTC is taking things to another level recently. The Desire S features a unibody aluminium shell that brings Apple to mind, but bizarrely not the iPhone.


The iPhone 4's glass and steel design is flashy and eye-catching, but something like the MacBook Pro's unibody build is more discreet, though no less impressive. It's the latter that the Desire S brings to mind, being made with a similar construction process that's resulted in the same kind of gentle angles along the edge.

There's a little bit of cheating going on, because the area around the camera and the slide-off panel on the bottom are both plastic, but that doesn't even come close to marring the overall quality. It's simply a stunningly made handset as far as basic build quality goes.

More than anything, it's comfortable to hold, and feels solid. There a small amount of give on the back, and you can hear it tapping the battery if you press your finger against it, but there's no give in the device otherwise – it lives up to its billing as a solid lump of metal.

Looking at the front, the most obvious change is the loss of physical buttons and optical trackpad. While real buttons can be a nice thing to have, the optical trackpad won't be missed. More precise text editing is now built into the OS, making it redundant, and losing it has meant HTC could shave a little off the device's height.

It's now 60 x 115 x 11.6mm, and weighs in at a middle-of-the-road 130g. While 11.6mm isn't hugely thick, it's certainly lagging behind in the skinny war going on between Apple, Samsung and Sony Ericsson. Maybe HTC's got it right, though – let them worry about fitting the battery in, and just make perfectly good normal phones.

The Desire S doesn't feel thick – it's a nice size in the hand, and the curved sides make it quite comfortable to hold.

The screen retains its 3.7-inch size and 480 x 800 resolution with Super LCD technology. The display is noticeably closer to the glass than the original Desire. It doesn't quite match the iPhone 4's printed-on-the-glass effect, but compared to the original it's certainly an improvement.

When we took the Desire S and original Desire out into the sun together, we actually found the new handset slightly harder to see with them both set to the highest brightness levels. It wasn't a major difference, but it was particularly noticeable when viewing from off-centre - which might be a big turn off for some.

Speaking of which, viewing angles are excellent, just as they were on the Desire S's predecessor. The screen in general is vibrant and clear, with text easily legible.

The touch-sensitive Android buttons (Home, Menu, Back and Search) are softly backlit, and give of a jolt of haptic feedback when pressed.

With it off, you can get to the battery and card slots by opening a little flip-open panel. It all feels slightly over-engineered, as though HTC has employed Brains from Thunderbirds to design the battery compartment while he was high on model glue.

Read more »

Future Mobile with Android

Gadgets like Apple’s iPhone and the assorted versions of Blackberry phones are revolutionizing mobile computing. Mobiles and mobile-like devices are increasingly blurring the traces between pocket book computers, notebooks and phones. The cellular computing revolution is on!

One platform, nevertheless, really stands out as a possible recreation changer. That platform is the Android platform from Google. Is Android the future of cellular computing? There’s actually a robust potential for Android to shape the future of cell computing. Open System Android’s energy comes from its openness. The Android SDK is open supply and the license governing Android itself permits any handset producer to use and modify it. This allows Android to form the future of mobile computing by making it obtainable to any hardware producer that desires to use it. Because of this Android is more likely to be the OS of selection for future cell computing hardware like tablet PCs or e-book readers. 

Android’s openness additionally applies to the selection of cellular carrier. This is one space where many users have been sad with Apple’s iPhone. Android is widely accessible which signifies that most wireless carriers have an Android handset available. Prospects need choice. By giving them selection, Android positions itself as the future of mobile computing. Improvement Kit Android’s best energy, nonetheless, is its development kit. Within the historical past of computing, the platforms that supported the applying builders greatest grew to become the clear winners. 


Failure to assist software builders with strong tools killed the actually Apple platform and IBM’s OS2. This is a mistake that Apple appears to be willing to repeat with the iPhone. The iPhone improvement tools are tough to make use of and the appliance approval process appears terribly subjective at times. This makes iPhone software improvement unprofitable for a lot of developers.

In distinction, the Android development tools use Java and even C/C++. This allows developers to jot down purposes for Android using languages they already know and use. Moreover, it allows them to make use of the instruments they’re already utilizing comparable to Eclipse. The Android SDK additionally gives a very sturdy emulator so that utility developers can take a look at their Android applications without counting on bodily hardware to do so. The way forward for mobile computing will largely be decided by the availability of the applications that end customers need and need. On this regard, android is a clear winner.


FragmentationThe largest hazard to Android’s dominance over the way forward for cell computing is fragmentation. The power of hardware vendors to increase Android without contributing their changes back to the Android challenge could result in numerous incompatible versions of Android. To some extent, this has already occurred as developers have had to battle some to make their purposes to help completely different hardware capabilities. 


This fragmentation of Android would make it more durable for software developers to put in writing code for Android. Because the help of utility builders is crucial to the success of any computing platform, fragmentation may very well be a severe threat to Android as the future of mobile computing. Is Android the way forward for cellular computing? I believe the answer is that it definitely may be.

Android’s open nature makes it possible for hardware builders to use it for no matter new gadgets they can imagine. Its SDK makes it straightforward for application builders to create the functions customers need and need. Each factors make Android a strong contender for the form of the way forward for mobile computing. Nonetheless, there is a danger that hardware vendors will customize Android to the extent that the platform becomes fragmented. If this occurs, will probably be more durable for utility builders to write down for Android and this could endanger its lead position as the way forward for cellular computing.

Read more »

Relating iphone and Android

Relating iphone and Android

When the iPhone first appeared on the market, it was a revolution in the mobile device area. Android took a while longer to materialize, but now that it is out there, some consumers are re-evaluating their “love affair” with iPhone. Learning from iPhone’s mistakes, Android was able to capitalize on many iPhones features that users find frustrating. In fact there are plenty of good reasons to dump your iPhone for an Android device.

iPhone’s Hideous Sync Options

Unlike the iPhone, the Android does not sync with the computer it is plugged into. One of the iPhone’s pet peeves is its insistence on syncing with the computer it is plugged into. Innocently plug your iPhone into someone else’s laptop, hit “sync” and watch all your content disappear.

Google Apps

While iPhone does provide a Gmail interface, this is where the buck stops, when it comes to Google apps. Not surprisingly, Android goes much further than iPhone in its integration with the Google suite. One example is the address book. Out-of-the-box, Android syncs its contacts with a Gmail account. This ensures that your contact records reside in a central location that can be accessed from any location and using various devices. Some Google applications host their data on the Google cloud instead of iTunes. This makes dumping the iPhone for Android especially attractive to those using Linux, and unable to run iTunes.

Multitasking

Multitasking has been one of the iPhone’s worst enemies. Switching between apps requires pushing the dreaded “Home” button, which closes one app and opens another. This gets extremely annoying when reading an email, for example. Clicking on a link within an email message effectively closes the email client and opens a browser window. As simple a task as returning back to the email requires hitting the “Home” button once more and re-opening the email app.

The Android solves this by providing multitasking capabilities out-of-the-box. You can run multiple applications simultaneously without having to close any of them. A drop-down window notifies you of any changes in an application you are running in the background. Although switching between apps is yet to reach its performance optimum – there is an lag time when switching between apps – it is a prominent feature that iPhone lacks.

Web Browser

One of the best reasons to dump your iPhone for Android is the web browsing experience. The Android’s built-in browser is fast, capable, and feature-rich. Unlike iPhone’s Safari, it supports Flash, allowing you to view many more sites than on the iPhone and watch videos directly in your mobile browser window.

Unified Notifications

Another reason to dump your iPhone for Android is the Android’s unified notification infrastructure. Android provides a single notification system available to Android app developers. This means that the Android can be configured to receive Facebook updates, weather alerts, tweets, Reddit submissions and other time-based events. The notification system allows you to stay on top of the things you care about without making the process overly cumbersome.

Open-Source Framework

Finally, Android is built on top of an open-source platform. While this may not matter to some, it may be crucial to others. Open-source software allows developers and device makers to have a much finer control over the phone hardware and the operating system that powers it. The iPhone’s lack of support for Flash is the best illustration of the impact of open-source software. If Flash support were missing on Android, developers would be able to add it quickly without waiting for Google to develop one.

Conclusion

There are a number of compelling reasons to dump your iPhone for an Android phone. Android allows multitasking, integrates well with Google online suite, provides a central notification system, and a terrific web browsing experience. Finally, as an open-source platform, Android allows developers to customize it in limitless ways. Check out Android today and you will quickly find yourself wishing you had not gone to the Apple store.

Read more »

Android in Future

Devices like Apple’s iPhone and the various versions of Blackberry smartphones are revolutionizing computing. Phones and phone-like devices are increasingly blurring the lines between notebook computers, netbooks and phones. The mobile computing revolution is on!

One platform, however, truly stands out as a potential game changer. That platform is the Android platform from Google. Is Android the future of mobile computing? There is certainly a strong potential for Android to shape the future of mobile computing.

Android’s strength comes from its openness. The Android SDK is open source and the license governing Android itself allows any handset manufacturer to use and modify it. This allows Android to shape the future of mobile computing by making it available to any hardware manufacturer that wants to use it. This means that Android is likely to be the OS of choice for future mobile computing hardware like tablet PCs or e-book readers.

Android’s openness also applies to the selection of mobile carrier. This is one area where many users have been unhappy with Apple’s iPhone. Android is widely available which means that most wireless carriers have an Android handset available. Customers want choice. By giving them choice, Android positions itself as the future of mobile computing.

Android’s greatest strength, however, is its development kit. In the history of computing, the platforms that supported the application developers best became the clear winners. Failure to support application developers with robust tools killed the really Apple platform and IBM’s OS2. This is a mistake that Apple seems to be willing to repeat with the iPhone. The iPhone development tools are difficult to use and the application approval process seems terribly subjective at times. This makes iPhone application development unprofitable for many developers. 


In contrast, the Android development tools use Java and even C/C++. This allows developers to write applications for Android using languages they already know and use. Additionally, it allows them to use the tools they are already using such as Eclipse. The Android SDK also provides a very robust emulator so that application developers can test their Android applications without relying on physical hardware to do so. The future of mobile computing will largely be determined by the availability of the applications that end users want and need. In this regard, Android is a clear winner.

The biggest danger to Android’s dominance over the future of mobile computing is fragmentation. The ability of hardware vendors to extend Android without contributing their changes back to the Android project could lead to various incompatible versions of Android. To some extent, this has already happened as developers have had to struggle some to make their applications to support different hardware capabilities. This fragmentation of Android would make it harder for application developers to write code for Android. Since the support of application developers is crucial to the success of any computing platform, fragmentation could be a serious threat to Android as the future of mobile computing.

Is Android the future of mobile computing? I think the answer is that it certainly could be. Android’s open nature makes it possible for hardware developers to use it for whatever new devices they can imagine. Its SDK makes it easy for application developers to create the applications users want and need. Both factors make Android a strong contender for the shape of the future of mobile computing. However, there is a danger that hardware vendors will customize Android to the extent that the platform becomes fragmented. If this happens, it will be harder for application developers to write for Android and this could endanger its lead position as the future of mobile computing

Read more »

Things In India Can Change the World

Every One should accept it

Yes Absolutely, Is your last word after reading this article,

Anything India accepts must be huge success in worldwide that everyone must agree to that why because let me discuss few things which makes you pretty owe.

Nokia –110105.6 units Quarter results more than 55% share from India.

Now come to Nokia mobiles before it launches in India it is nothing in the market, but once it launched in India it has been changed entirely. It kept the shape and devices are very simple which are very helpful and understandable to everyone who are illiterate also. Its GUI is user friendly.

IPL---Indian Premier League.

Now come to Cricket it is already well known sport in India but not 20-20.Indians don’t know 20-20 match before Indian team played and won the first 20-20 match with South Africa in ------.

After that once Indian people tasted the T20 match from their onwards the T20 cyclone has started .From their onwards the one or two T20 matches started in total ODI or Test series and then tremendously T20 series also started and finally World Cup and IPL.

As Time permits I can update more on this issue ………..

Keep sharing your ideas to this post which makes an immense pleasure to the author .

Read more »

Indians Vs Football

Football

           Soccer (more popularly known as Football in many regions) is a team sport that is popular in almost every country in the world. The huge fan following is perhaps due to the fact that at an amateur level, it requires very little equipment and effort to learn the basics. Thus, kids start playing soccer at an early age and go on to become ardent followers of the game. Soccer is also the highest paying team sport at professional level. The prize money for the winning team at the 2010 soccer world cup was US $30 million. The synonym of enthusiasm and zeal, soccer or soccer posses the number 1 ranking in the world's most popular sports.

Cricket

         The second most popular sport in the world is also a team sport. Cricket's number two spot in terms of number of fans is thanks largely due to its popularity in the Indian sub-continent. It is popular in Asia, Australia, England and few selected countries, but is slowly expanding its reach to other countries. Cricket is a rather interesting sport with many formats - from test matches which last for 5 days to the more recent 20-20 format which has duration of about 3 hours. The original format of the game (5 days) and the somewhat involved rules and skills required meant that Cricket was popular among a few selected countries to begin with. However, the introduction of the 20-20 format has resulted in many more countries participating in the sport at an international level.

India Vs Football

           Most of the countries are very familiar with football even in India also. All the population of countries which are excellent in football are not equal to population of India. But India don’t find good football team for even qualify in FIFA. Why this was happened and what was the reason behind it. At this situation every one brain works fine that was “Cricket” .Cricket dominates all the sports in India. Even though the national sport of India is itself dominated by cricket. For world cup of hockey also they are not much public to view the match, that was the situation in India.
            After starting 20-20 world cup and Indian Premier League (IPL), cricket becomes not only a sport it turned into a Multi-Billion business. Initially the matches with 5 days are able to watch by Indian public than why they should miss a chance of watching complete match in 3 hours like 20-20. That’s the main reason that no other sport in India is not popularizing as much as cricket.

           In these circumstances how any other sport like football can grow up? Everyone is looking to sponsor cricket only then how football people get support in money or in other things .That’s the main reason in India no other sports are well growing. 

           Sport like football requires extra attention that means they need to dedicate themselves to football only, so in that case they need to take care by All India Football Federation only. Without having much representation of football, how can they maintain them? So that’s why the Indian football federation not able find good team to play even having the 120crore population.

I think now you got idea why I kept Indians Vs football as a name of this post.

Share your comments on this post …………….your participation is important for us .That makes this post worthy.

Read more »

How to get Adsense account very easily

     AdSense is an ad serving application run by Google Inc. Website owners can enroll in this program to enable text, image, and video advertisements on their websites or blogspots.

         To get Google AdSense account approved is a dream of each and every blogger or webmaster. Because AdSense plays a major role in monetizing a website. In this article, I am telling you how I got my AdSense account approved within 2 weeks. There are lots of tips and tricks around the internet that says how to get you AdSense approved within 1 day, and even 1 hour! But it’s never possible. It may at least take a week to get AdSense approved. The most important thing, I know some of my friends whose AdSense was denied and they went on to some seller who sells approved AdSense accounts. AdSense strictly prohibits selling accounts. So, if your AdSense was denied, don’t just stop there to purchase accounts. Try once again after implementing these little tips:

• First you must read, understand and follow Google Adsense terms and conditions before you begin. Though It is very friendly but you must be careful about it.
• Try to increase the traffic of you site. It’s simple but need to work hard to get better traffic. Also you can say as More Traffic => More Clicks => More Income
• The content of your blog should be original and unique.
• Update your site contents frequently to avoid old contents problem.
• If your blog is in “Under construction” then ready your blog as soon as possible.
• Your site must be easily navigable. Avoid broken links on your site.

    They are number of terms and conditions of adsense . Make sure your site is according to adsense.

   

       Now come to my story i got approved from Google in very little span of time .I followed their very important conditions but not all.I completed 14 posts and then i applied for a adsense account . Initially i was refused 3 times by adsense people but after sometime i made my changes according their requirements.

        One day i applied for adsense with no hope , i got approved ,its happy for me .But i read no of post regarding adsense account they said "getting an adsense account is not great deal but keep it safe with google terms and conditions" .In any stage if we failed to keep our account according to google adsense T&C it is going to disable our account , then all of our hard work is going waste .

   So  who are thinking for adsense they must know T&C of it .

                           "All the Best" for those who are desperately trying for Adsense Account.

Read more »